What Now?

The demise of the Coalition Government will have an impact on the nature of the NT intervention. For the better, in my, and many others, opinion.

Based on Labor’s public comments and commitments we can expect the following;

  • CDEP will continue and increase in scope much to the relief of many community organisations
  • the permit system will not be revoked for remote communities

What other alterations may occur are unknown, but here are my best guesses,

  • the compulsory acquisition of communities for 5 years will be abandoned
  • government business managers will be phased out
  • the quarantining of welfare payments will no longer apply to everyone but will be implemented on a case-by-case basis with a right to appeal.
  • SBS will not be banned in the NT.

Generally in Indigenous affairs, we can expect;

  • a new elected national Indigenous body (bye-bye to the Govt appointed and ineffectual NIC)
  • a more consultative and considered approachbut also an outcome orientated approach
  • a shake-up at the Office of Indigenous Policy Co-ordination (which can’t) and the Indigenous Co-ordination Centres (which don’t).


And what an appropriate place for the former Minister, Mal Brough. His time as Minister was meteoric – short and spectacular. While his loss in his own electorate of Longman almost certainly had nothing to do with the NTER, as Chris Graham (Editor of NIT) noted at Crikey (thanks Club Troppo ), there was a voter assessment of the intervention in the seat of Lingiari which covers all the affected communities. It seems that remote communities weren’t as enthusiastic for the intervention as Mr Brough was. There weren’t big changes, but most of the swings in remote polling booths were towards rather than away from Labor. One interesting result was from Oenpelli in Western Arnhem land, where the CLP managed an amazing 14 votes out of the 699 cast. The Greens beat them with 21.


3 Responses to “What Now?”

  1. melber Says:

    I’ve just been reading random excerpts from your blog that I’ve only just come across (via John Quiggin). It is very depressing reading – even if I’m not entirely unfamiliar with the content of much of it. Since Rudd has promised to maintain the Intervention, I too have my fingers crossed for something that (a) recognizes the chronic nature of the issues and therefore needs long-term commitment; (b) actually implements the recommendations of the Children are Sacred report – why do we need more consultation when the consultation has already happened; (c) recognizes the complexity and symbiosis of many of the problems; (d) helps to build rather than destroy self-esteem in the communities. What are the chances?

    Has Jenny Macklin been sighted up there yet?

  2. nawagadj Says:

    No, no sign of Macklin yet.

    The NT’s new Mnisiter for Indig. Policy, Marion Scrymgour, is due to meet her in Canberra this week. There has been an unconfirmed report (yesterday) that the $100 mil for health services is no longer available. I doubt that is an entirely accurate report.

  3. melber Says:

    It seems you will be seeing her next week.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: